GEDCOM Tags: SOUR, REPO, PAGE, TEXT
Verfasst: 12.05.2012, 23:24
I am working with a German user of Ahnenblatt 2.70 who is helping me to do some research. I use Family Tree Maker (FTM) 2012 v21.0.0.529. We have exchanged GEDCOMs, but source citations are lost on import both ways. What follows is my best attempt to explain what is happening, in case this information is relevant. My goal, however, is simply to find a workaround, if it exists, so that I can exchange GEDCOMs with Ahnenblatt using even the simplest of source citations. I will come back to this again after presenting the problem.
From AB to FTM:
FTM fails to import multiple SOUR tags from GEDCOMs created by Ahnenblatt. It will only import the first SOUR, but then that same source is used for all subsequent citations. Here is an example from AB to illustrate.
When imported into FTM 2012, SOUR "SRA Trebon 4/220" is applied to the name facts for both Maria FIDLER and Anna FIEDLER. SOUR "SRA Trebon 3/68" and all subsequent SOUR tags are ignored. In other words, FTM thinks there is only one source, and it applies that (first) source to the name fact of any individuals that follow with a SOUR tag in the GEDCOM. I hope that makes sense.
From FTM to AB:
Source citations are handled differently in FTM 2012. They are applied to facts, not the whole person. I think AB sources apply to individuals. If I'm correct, this causes problems when passing the GEDCOM back to AB because the sources in FTM will always apply to specific facts. When a fact isn't specified in AB (because it's 1 SOUR XXX instead of 2 SOUR XXX), then it's automatically applied to the name fact in FTM on import. When a GEDCOM from FTM then is imported into AB, all of these fact-specific citations are ignored.) Here is an example of the same two individuals in a GEDCOM exported by FTM.
When this is imported into AB 2.7, many relevant tags are ignored. Here is a sample of the related tags that were ignored by AB:
My understanding of what I see here is that source citations are not supported by AB for facts such as names, occupations, etc. I also note that some of the more detailed source details from the DATA and TEXT tags are also ignored. It doesn't matter to me that AB does not support these things, because I will simplify the citations in accordance with its capabilities. The problem, however, is that only "State Regional Archives of Třeboň" survives the transition from FTM to AB, but I don't know from which fact this derives. (Seeing that this survives gives me some hope that a workaround is possible.)
My Question:
Hopefully I've explained the problem well enough for someone to propose a solution for us. Is there any way to get a string like "SRA Trebon 13/4" in any part of a source citation from AB to FTM to AB? If so, can you advise how this information should be recorded in both AB and FTM?
From AB to FTM:
FTM fails to import multiple SOUR tags from GEDCOMs created by Ahnenblatt. It will only import the first SOUR, but then that same source is used for all subsequent citations. Here is an example from AB to illustrate.
Code: Alles auswählen
[...]
0 @I9@ INDI
1 NAME Maria /FIDLER/
1 SEX F
1 BIRT
2 DATE 25 JUN 1741
1 FAMS @F6@
1 FAMC @F1@
1 SOUR SRA Trebon 4/220
0 @I10@ INDI
1 NAME Anna /FIEDLER/
1 SEX F
1 BIRT
2 DATE 28 MAR 1674
1 FAMS @F7@
1 FAMC @F3@
1 SOUR SRA Trebon 3/68
[...]
From FTM to AB:
Source citations are handled differently in FTM 2012. They are applied to facts, not the whole person. I think AB sources apply to individuals. If I'm correct, this causes problems when passing the GEDCOM back to AB because the sources in FTM will always apply to specific facts. When a fact isn't specified in AB (because it's 1 SOUR XXX instead of 2 SOUR XXX), then it's automatically applied to the name fact in FTM on import. When a GEDCOM from FTM then is imported into AB, all of these fact-specific citations are ignored.) Here is an example of the same two individuals in a GEDCOM exported by FTM.
Code: Alles auswählen
[...]
0 @I9@ INDI
1 NAME Maria /FIDLER/
2 SOUR @S1@
3 PAGE Book 04: Baptisms (1721-1760), Image 220, Maria Fidler
1 SEX F
1 BIRT
2 DATE 25 JUN 1741
2 SOUR @S1@
3 PAGE Book 04: Baptisms (1721-1760), Image 220, Maria Fidler
1 FAMS @F6@
1 FAMC @F1@
0 @I10@ INDI
1 NAME Anna /FIEDLER/
1 SEX F
1 BIRT
2 DATE 28 MAR 1674
2 SOUR @S1@
3 PAGE Book 03: Baptisms (1666-1720), Image 086, Anna Fiedler
3 NOTE @N15@
1 FAMS @F7@
1 FAMC @F3@
[...]
0 @S1@ SOUR
1 TITL State Regional Archives of Třeboň
1 REPO @R1@
0 @R1@ REPO
1 NAME digi.ceskearchivy.cz
[...]
Code: Alles auswählen
[...]
BAPM.SOUR._FOOT was ignored. [line 507]
[...]
BAPM.SOUR._FOOT.CONC was ignored. [line 508]
[...]
BAPM.SOUR.DATA.TEXT.CONC was ignored. [line 380]
[...]
BAPM.SOUR.DATA.TEXT.CONT was ignored. [line 379]
[...]
BAPM.SOUR.PAGE was ignored. [line 193]
[...]
DEAT.SOUR.PAGE was ignored. [line 107]
[...]
MARR.SOUR was ignored. [line 1006]
[...]
MARR.SOUR.PAGE was ignored. [line 1007]
[...]
MARR.SOUR.PAGE.CONC was ignored. [line 1008]
[...]
NAME.SOUR was ignored. [line 145]
[...]
NAME.SOUR._FOOT was ignored. [line 481]
[...]
NAME.SOUR._FOOT.CONC was ignored. [line 482]
[...]
NAME.SOUR.DATA.TEXT was ignored. [line 252]
[...]
NAME.SOUR.DATA.TEXT.CONC was ignored. [line 254]
[...]
NAME.SOUR.DATA.TEXT.CONT was ignored. [line 253]
[...]
NAME.SOUR.NOTE was ignored. [line 168]
[...]
NAME.SOUR.PAGE was ignored. [line 146]
[...]
OCCU.SOUR was ignored. [line 242]
[...]
OCCU.SOUR.PAGE was ignored. [line 243]
[...]
REPO was ignored. [line 1149]
[...]
My Question:
Hopefully I've explained the problem well enough for someone to propose a solution for us. Is there any way to get a string like "SRA Trebon 13/4" in any part of a source citation from AB to FTM to AB? If so, can you advise how this information should be recorded in both AB and FTM?